WebIt is a network Address. Please change your Ip address between 192.168.0.1-192.168.0.254. Then It will be solved. Network address is explained by techopedia as follows. A network address is any logical or physical address that uniquely distinguishes a network node or device over a computer or telecommunications network. WebMar 20, 2024 · Here you need to verify if the problem is the subnet mask or the IP included under the interface, in this case as the subnet mask is /24 you need to include a valid IP different with ending "0" or "255". Under the interface you can configure valid IP addresses only. Network: 192.168.1.0/24 Valid IP addresses: 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.1.254
Bad mask /30 for address in Router Cisco (Packet …
WebOct 13, 2006 · Bad mask /24 for address 172.17.0.3 This is my config no ip subnet-zero ... Classful addressing implies a subnet mask based on the class of address: A, B, or C. ... Sorry for the mix up. Here, in CCNP 1 Advanced Routing, version 3.0, Cisco Academy... "Variable-Length Subnet Mask (VLSM) allows an organization to use more than one … WebJun 11, 2024 · Bad mask /31 for address 192.168.200.5 Switch (config-if)#ip add 192.168.200.5 255.255.255.252 why is 254 a bad mask and not 252? That's all Thank … diamond shaped bookshelves
cisco - Bad Mask for IP Address Error - Network …
WebJun 18, 2024 · 10.1.1.3/30 is the directed broadcast address for that subnet and as such, it isn't usable as host address. You can use 10.1.1.1 and 10.1.1.2 from that subnet. If you … WebJul 1, 2012 · In Cisco Packet tracer, I am told to set a ip address of an interface (Fastethernet 0/0) to be the first address of network 10.0.0./30. I entered the following commands: interace Fastethernet 0/0 ip address 10.0.0.0 255.255.252 Bad mask /30 for address 10.0.0.0 It is stating that /30 is the bad mask, why is that? Thanks! · or Register … WebJun 18, 2008 · Router (config)# interface f0/0 Router (config-if)# ip address 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.254 % Warning: use /31 mask on non point-to-point interface cautiously An ominous warning message, no doubt, but it works just fine. We can successfully ping the far-end interface (10.0.0.1), and the subnet is accurately reflected in the routing table: diamond shaped black earrings